SOLASPINSView Top Casinos
SOLASPINS EDITORIAL POLICY

How we check
what we publish.

This page explains what a Solaspins claim is worth and what it is not. It will not tell you that any casino is safe, that a payout will arrive in a stated time, or that an offer is good value — those are things no comparison site can know about your account, and we would rather say so than imply otherwise.

See the comparison

Written by Nadia Kerr

Published · Claims last verified against their sources on

No ratings, no scores, no fixed bonus figures.

How we check this
01

What a listing
actually claims.

A casino appearing on this site means one thing: a source we can point at names it as accepting Solana, and we have recorded which source and when. It does not mean we hold an account there, that a withdrawal has been observed, or that the operator serves your country.

Those are separate facts and each needs its own evidence. Where we have that evidence, the page states it with a date. Where we do not, the page says the field is not documented rather than filling it with something plausible.

The practical consequence for a reader is simple. Treat every figure here as a starting point for a check you run in the operator's own cashier, because the cashier is the only current authority on limits, fees, networks and eligibility.

02

The three registers
every claim carries.

This table is our own editorial rule rather than an external standard. A sentence that fits none of the three registers is cut before publication rather than softened with a hedge.

The three registers
RegisterWhat it meansWhat it requires before publication
DocumentedSomebody here read it on the primary source and recorded the date.The date of the reading, and the record of what was read. A documented claim without a date is not published.
SourcedA named third party published it and we attribute them inline.The link to that party, and the date we read it. We do not launder a third-party claim into our own voice.
StructuralIt is always true of the mechanism being described.Nothing dated, because nothing about it changes. A withdrawal cannot use a network the operator does not support, whatever the date is.
What you will not find on this site.

No star ratings, no scores out of ten, and no aggregate rating in our structured data — we publish no scores, so we claim none. No fixed welcome-bonus figure, because the number moves and the terms attached to it move faster. No payout time in minutes. No licence status we have not read in the regulator's own register, and no operator logo that is not the operator's own file.

03

What happens before
an operator is listed.

Five checks, in order. An operator that fails one is not quietly downgraded — the field it failed is published empty, and the page says which.

01Find a nameable sourceSomething we can link that states the operator accepts SOL. An operator with no linkable source does not get a row.
02Read the licence in the registerThe regulator's own register or verification tool, never the footer badge. A badge is a claim; a register is a check. Where we cannot resolve it, the record says the licence is reported, not verified.
03Record the verification postureWhat triggers identity verification, in the operator's own words, with the date we read it. Where the operator does not state a trigger, the record says the trigger is unknown.
04Record what is missingDeposit minimums, withdrawal minimums and restricted regions are written as pending when we have not confirmed them. An empty field is a visible task; a guessed field is a liability.
05Set a verification dateThe date a human last checked the record. It moves only when someone re-reads the source, which is the entire reason it is worth showing you.
04

What a verification
date means here.

Every page carries the date its claims were last checked against their sources. That date moves when someone re-reads the primary source and not otherwise.

Re-dating a page without a check is the cheapest trick in this industry and the easiest to run at scale. It is also self-defeating: a freshness signal that anyone can mint on a cron job tells a reader nothing, and Google's own guidance on helpful content describes content produced primarily to game rankings rather than to help a person as the thing its systems are built to discount.

Comparison pages are re-checked on a ninety-day cycle and explainers on a hundred-and-eighty-day cycle, plus a change-log line whenever terms actually move.

05

How position
is decided.

List position is editorial and its basis is stated on the page that carries the list. It is not a score, and there is no formula that turns a set of ratings into an order, because we publish no ratings to feed one.

Operator links on this site are affiliate links and are marked as such in the markup with rel="nofollow sponsored". A commercial relationship does not buy a claim: a paid link cannot make a licence verified, cannot fill a pending field, and cannot remove a caveat from a page.

Google's spam policies treat affiliate pages that add no original value as a category of their own. The defence against that is not a disclosure line; it is the record — dated checks, named sources, and empty fields left visibly empty.

Check us, and tell us when we are wrong.

Every image on this site is recorded in a public provenance file at /assets/manifest.json: where the file came from, on what date, under what basis, and what it is allowed to depict. Every source behind a page is listed at the foot of it. If a page here disagrees with what the operator's cashier shows you, the cashier is right and we want to know.

06

Questions
worth asking.

How do you spot fake casino reviews?

Look for a score with no method behind it, a bonus figure with no date, a licence badge that is a picture rather than a register link, and a ranking that never changes. Ask what the site would have to publish to be shown wrong. If nothing would, it is advertising.

Do you test the casinos you list?

Not yet, and we do not claim to. Where a page describes something we observed ourselves, it says so with a date. Everything else is attributed to its source or described as a mechanism. A tested claim requires a logged check behind it.

Why are there no ratings or scores?

A score compresses several unrelated facts into one number and hides which fact moved it. We publish the facts instead, each with its own date and source, and no AggregateRating in our structured data.

Are your links affiliate links?

Yes. Operator links are affiliate links, marked in the markup as nofollow and sponsored. They do not affect what a page says: no commercial relationship can verify a licence, fill an empty field, or remove a caveat.

What does the verification date on a page mean?

That a person re-read the primary sources behind that page on that date. It does not move for a redesign, a rebuild, or a wording change. If nothing was re-checked, the date does not move.

Research boundary.

This page is built from the sources below and from what the operators themselves publish. It is not a promise of current terms: offers, limits, verification rules and regional availability change without notice, and the operator's live cashier is the only current authority on all four. Where we could not read a primary source, the page says so rather than filling the gap.

KEEP READINGWe are paid by the casinos Nadia Kerr is a pen name When we get it wrong